Tasmia Ansari
|
April 1, 2025
|
5
min read
Prebiotic or probiotic—what should you be eating?
To aid the gut’s complex ecosystem, know how to balance both
Read More
The secret sauce? Small batches, pre-cut veggies and repurposing
Meal prepping, an efficient and productive way to make sure you eat healthy, home-cooked food has populated online and offline conversation. The mere mention of meal prepping can conjure up a stereotypical image: of neatly stacked containers filled with the dull beiges and greens of boiled chicken, broccoli, and quinoa.
For Indians, though, the picture doesn’t have to look this way. Meal prepping–some form of it, at least–has become necessary in the modern life, although it doesn’t hurt to remember that women have always “meal-prepped” in the Indian kitchen: washed, cut and stored away vegetables and fruits, prepared pickles for months to come, ground chutneys to spruce up meals throughout the week.
For young professionals in urban areas, meal prepping may look different, but in the tedium of city life, it can be the recourse for sustaining cooking autonomy – while not sacrificing on health or taste.
Also read: Mindful eating: A wellness tool, or trendy byte?
However, meal prepping isn’t without its drawbacks. Sure, it promises to save your time and make your meals healthier, but the process can easily lead to wasted food. The domestic kitchen is no stranger to the guilt of wilting greens, slops of dals, and uneaten leftovers. So, how do we marry the art of meal prepping while keeping sustainability in mind and avoiding the monotony of repetitive meals?
Here’s a guide to meal prepping for the Indian diet—designed to save time and taste.
1. Cook in small batches to avoid spoilage
Instead of prepping an entire week’s meals, aim for only 3–4 days. Indian dishes, especially those with fresh coconut or dairy, can spoil quickly. Cooking in smaller quantities reduces the risk of food going bad, and the ability to cook more for fewer days ensures variety in your meals.
2. Plan around perishables
When meal prepping, prioritise using fresh ingredients early in the week. It can be tempting to stock your fridge with fresh produce to use throughout the week, but you may not get around to it–your produce will remain fresher and more useful when purposed into, say, a coriander chutney or a green curry base on Day 1 and then frozen in portions. Planning around perishables will help you avert your greens from wilting in the back of your fridge.
3. Repurpose leftovers
Meal prepping doesn’t mean every meal has to be a fresh start, using a fresh batch of veggies or proteins. While prepping your ingredients is a large part of it, meal prepping for the Indian kitchen encompasses the larger idea of thinking ahead and using food sustainably – and “prepping” in this way also means thinking creatively about using your leftovers. Turn yesterday’s dal into dal parathas or use leftover sabzi as stuffing for sandwiches. Rice, the Indian staple, can transform into fried rice, lemon rice, a quick rice bowl mix–and if you have some more time on hand, you can just take the cooked rice, grind it with grated coconut, soaked rice, urad dal and water and whip up a batch of leftover rice dose for breakfast or lunch!
4. Label and rotate
Clear, pretty air-tight containers are great for meal-prepping, but labeling them is the non-negotiable part. Write down the date you cooked each dish to ensure you’re eating the oldest items first. The ugly side of meal prepping often is forgetting the food you’ve made and discovering that your old containers are now housing new ecosystems. Labelling can go a long way in countering this.
5. Prepping ingredients and not just dishes
While meal prepping does involve preparing full meals ahead of time, the tedium of eating the same meal–or even similar meals–every day can make you averse to the whole process. Instead of prepping full meals, consider prepping ingredients. Chop vegetables, boil dals and soak pulses overnight, prepare spice marinades in advance for a quick dinner after work. This reduces waste by giving you flexibility to cook fresh, diverse meals without the stress of starting from scratch.
6. Pre-chop and freeze vegetables
Vegetables like peas, beans, carrots, and spinach freeze beautifully. Contrary to popular belief, frozen vegetables don’t lose their nutritional value. In fact, they’re often frozen at peak freshness, locking in nutrients better than produce slowly aging in your fridge for days. Freezing also gives you the ability to prep it in bigger batches, because you can use them over a longer period of time.
Also read: Micronutrients 101: Your guide to nature's tiny health boosters
1. Don’t forget about the safety of your food
Cooked rice and dals are particularly susceptible to bacterial growth. Store them in shallow containers to cool quickly and refrigerate within two hours. While refrigeration is a must, make sure to consume them within the first few days.
2. Don’t give into storage myths
Myth: Freezing food reduces its nutritional value.
In reality, frozen foods, especially vegetables like peas, spinach, and corn, are flash-frozen at peak freshness. They are actually a reliable alternative to fresh produce. The same also applies to meat, if you so choose to marinate and prep meat ahead of time in the freezer.
Myth: Refrigerating food for more than a day makes it unhealthy.
When in reality, properly stored, cooked food can last up to 3–4 days in the refrigerator without losing its quality or nutritional value. The key is to cool food quickly and store it in airtight containers.
Myth: Freezing chapatis makes them rubbery.
In reality, semi-cooked chapatis or parathas freeze and reheat well on a hot tawa, retaining their softness. The trick is to separate each piece with parchment paper before freezing. Instead of microwaving your chapatis, make sure to heat them on a pan/tawa.
3. Don’t overstuff your fridge
Meal prepping is ultimately about organisation. Overloading your fridge can cause uneven cooling, leading to spoilage. Prioritise what you’ll actually eat instead of prepping with misplaced gusto.
4. Don’t discard edible scraps
That ridge gourd peel you were about to toss can be turned into a delicious chutney. The stems of coriander, often thrown away with their muddy roots, can add incredible flavour to a curry base or tadka. Vegetable scraps can be used for stocks or composted to reduce waste. Meal prepping doesn’t have to compromise efficiency over sustainability when you can have both!
India wastes an estimated 78.2 million tonnes of food annually, nearly one-third of what is produced. This wastage occurs at every stage—harvest, storage, transportation, and consumption. In urban households, much of it comes from the kitchen: uneaten leftovers, rotting produce, and over-purchased groceries.
The environmental cost of this waste is staggering. It is estimated that decomposing food in landfills contributes to 8–10% of global greenhouse gas emissions. For a country like India, where millions still go hungry daily, the dichotomy is stark.
Meal prepping, if done thoughtfully, can help address this crisis with appropriate stockage, freezing, repurposing leftovers, and upcycling your ingredients. At the end of the day, meal prepping can shape up to a practice of productivity, autonomy and care.
Also read: Macronutrients 101: What your body craves and why
Complete with a cleaning, feeding and burping routine
Kombucha, a tangy, fizzy fermented tea, has captured the attention of health enthusiasts across the world. In India, it has made its way into cafes and grocery stores, but at a steep cost—bottles often range between ₹250 and ₹400. Brewing your own kombucha at home offers a far more economical solution, with costs dropping to just ₹10–₹15 per serving. Beyond the savings, the DIY process lets you control the ingredients, ensuring a healthier drink free from preservatives and excess sugar. You can also infuse it with flavours that you like, whether it’s ginger, tulsi, or fruit blends like mango or guava.
Making kombucha at home involves fermenting sweetened tea with a SCOBY—a Symbiotic Culture of Bacteria and Yeast that works its magic over time. The process is surprisingly simple and requires little more than tea, sugar, and patience.
Also read: The 'plant' doctor will see you now
To start with, the tea is brewed, sweetened, and allowed to cool. You can use black or green tea, but make sure to brew a big old batch of it, and add sufficient sugar (usually a fourth of a cup of sugar for one litre of tea). Kombucha is brewed pretty much like any other fermented drink: the microbes in your brew need sugars to feed on, so they can release molecules and proteins that fizz up your brew. But they can only feed on cane sugar–so don’t swap it out for any other sweeteners. The tea will cool down, and that’s when you add the SCOBY to it. This is a gelatinous, fairly cloudy slab of microbes that will feel slimy to the touch. You can find SCOBY online (in SCOBY kits) or even get them from friends who regularly brew kombucha. Along with the SCOBY, add some starter tea–a small amount of store-bought, unflavoured kombucha. If this reminds you of setting aside milk in a dark corner of your kitchen to turn it into dahi, it’s because both processes follow the exact same science: just like you’d add one spoon of microbe-filled dahi to milk and start an infinite chain of homemade curd, you can keep aside some unflavoured kombucha from your brewing batch and keep adding it, as a starter, for your future batches!
Brewing kombucha doesn’t take too long–compare it to vinegars, which sour away for months before you can use them!–but if you want to cook up a flavoured kombucha, it does take two phases. The first phase is to ferment the sweet tea into kombucha and the second, shorter phase is to flavour it with fruits.
The first fermentation (F1) takes place over seven to 10 days, with the bacteria and yeast transforming the sugary tea into a probiotic-rich, slightly sour beverage. Make sure you store your clean glass jar of tea and SCOBY in a cool, dark corner (ideally, 20-26° C); avoid direct sunlight or drafty spots.
The length of fermentation determines its taste—shorter brews are sweeter, while longer ones have a tangier, almost vinegary kick.
The second phase of fermentation (F2) is optional, but fairly straightforward if you wish to infuse flavour into your kombucha. To begin with, remove the SCOBY from your kombucha, and strain the liquid. Divvy it up into small batches that you want to flavour, and go ahead and add your flavourings: fruit pieces or juices; pieces of ginger or herbs; spices like cinnamon, cardamom etc. Transfer these batches into clean, air-tight bottles, leaving some room at the top. This phase requires you to ferment the drink again for about two to five days, so a lot of fizz will form: that’s why the room at the top. In fact, one crucial step in this process is to “burp” the bottles daily. Quite literally, you are required to slowly open the bottle caps and release the gas before screwing it tight again. Five days of this, and you’ll have a flavoured, fizzy drink.
When you’re happy with the flavour and carbonation, remember to store your kombucha in refrigerators–not just for it to chill, but also because this will finally stop the fermentation and carbonation process.
Brewing at home also has an environmental edge. By reusing jars and bottles, you cut down on the plastic waste associated with store-bought drinks. For Indian kitchens, where sustainability and frugality are often part of daily life, this is an added advantage. Plus, the joy of nurturing your own SCOBY and watching the tea evolve into kombucha can be immensely satisfying—it’s like a living science project in your kitchen.
However, there are a few precautions to keep in mind. Cleanliness is crucial, as contaminated equipment can lead to mold or harmful bacteria. Always use sterilised jars and utensils to ensure a safe brew. If you notice fuzzy mold growing on the surface—a rare but possible issue—it’s best to discard the batch and start over. Additionally, kombucha is naturally fizzy, so bottles need to be sealed tightly during secondary fermentation to trap the carbonation. This step requires careful monitoring to prevent over-fermentation, which can lead to pressure build-up in bottles.
Also read: The fragile future of Guchi mushrooms
The health benefits of kombucha make it worth the effort. It’s loaded with probiotics that improve gut health and digestion, and its antioxidants may help reduce inflammation. It’s also a great alternative to sugary sodas and energy drinks, offering a natural caffeine kick with minimal calories. For those wary of sugary beverages, homemade kombucha provides the ability to control the sweetness, especially important for people managing diabetes or simply aiming to reduce sugar intake. It’s important to note, though, that you can’t actually brew kombucha without sugar, or even with less sugar–the microbes need enough to feed on. So, the way to control sweetness is to monitor for how long you ferment your kombucha – the longer the brew, the more sugar will be consumed by the microbes, and the less there will be for you. By some estimates, fermenting kombucha for about 50 days removes all the sugar in it.
While the process may seem intimidating at first, kombucha brewing is forgiving and adaptable to Indian kitchens. You don’t need specialised equipment—just a large glass jar, a breathable cloth to cover it, and bottles for storing the finished product. With just a little practice, you’ll have a refreshing, healthful drink that’s not only easy on your wallet but also packed with flavour and probiotics.
Brewing kombucha at home isn’t just about health or saving money—it’s a step towards a more intentional way of living. By taking control of what you consume, you create a drink that’s uniquely yours, while reducing reliance on packaged goods. For those looking to embrace healthier habits without breaking the bank, kombucha offers an easy, rewarding start.
How a Japanese farmer succeeded with no plowing or weeding
Teasing grain, vegetables, and citrus from the earth has always demanded back-breaking labour. The life of a farmer is one of constant exposure—to the merciless summer sun, the bitter chill of winter, and the unpredictable rains. And the toil doesn’t stop with the weather. Pest invasions, crop failures, and slim margins often drive farmers to abandon their fields, for the promise of steadier incomes in urban areas. The modern agricultural system, which relies heavily on machines plowing through fields and industrial grade pouring of chemicals over crops, has left many farmers feeling overwhelmed and disillusioned.
Amid a system that constantly demanded more labour and machinery, came Masanobu Fukuoka: a Japanese farmer and philosopher with an entirely different approach—one rooted in humility and a near-religious deference to nature. Fukuoka passed away in 2008 at the age of 95, but his philosophy continues to resonate. His vision—of a farming system that works with nature rather than against it—offers a counterpoint to the high-input, high-stress agriculture that dominates much of the world today.
His method, often referred to as “do-nothing” farming, rejects the core pillars of conventional agriculture: no plowing, no chemical fertilisers, no pesticides, and no weeding. Fukuoka doesn’t mean to say that farmers should sit idle. Rather, his philosophy is about stepping back and observing nature’s wisdom, allowing it to guide farming practices instead of imposing human will.
Born in 1913, Fukuoka’s journey to this radical simplicity was anything but straightforward. He began his career as a scientist, working in a laboratory to develop agricultural techniques. But a crisis of faith in the modern approach to farming led him to return to his native village. There, he tested his ideas on his own fields, slowly uncovering what he called “natural farming.”
“An object seen in isolation from the whole is not the real thing,” Fukuoka wrote in his 1975 book The One-Straw Revolution, a no-tilling manifesto. Through this work, he gently but firmly dismantled the premises of modern agriculture, arguing that they had damaged the soil, weakened plants, and poisoned ecosystems. For Fukuoka, nature was a unified and self-sufficient whole, capable of thriving without human interference. Human “cleverness,” he believed, was often the root of the problem.
Natural farming, as Fukuoka practiced it, required less labour than traditional methods but not a complete absence of effort. Although the method is also called ‘no-till’ or ’do-nothing farming’, it doesn’t translate to sitting back and relaxing. There was still work to be done—casting seeds, mulching, and maintaining the land thoughtfully with care and sensitivity. But the goal was to work in a symbiosis with nature, not in disruption of it. For example, instead of plowing to control weeds, Fukuoka used a ground cover of white clover and a mulch of barley straw to suppress unwanted growth. His approach was deliberate and experimental, not one that left the land recklessly abandoned.
Also read: Sikkim shows how to farm without chemicals
“Crops grow themselves,” he famously proclaims, insisting that plants, left to their natural course, would flourish without the need for heavy-handed human intervention. Yet, he acknowledged that this philosophy cannot be adopted overnight. Transitioning to natural farming often requires an initial period of adjustment—some weeding, composting, or pruning—but these measures would gradually diminish as the system stabilises.
Fukuoka distilled his philosophy into four guiding principles: no cultivation, no chemical fertilisers or prepared compost, no weeding by tillage or herbicides, and no dependence on chemicals. These were not rigid commandments but a framework that farmers can adapt to their unique environments. Fukuoka repeatedly emphasised that his methods were not recipes to be copied. When one of his students tried to replicate his techniques on a different land, the attempt failed. Each plot of land, Fukuoka argued, requires its own process of observation and experimentation.
The man’s admiration for nature extended to weeds and insects, long considered villains of the farm. Weeds, he argued, often played a beneficial role: fixing nitrogen in the soil, aerating it, and even repelling harmful pests. Similarly, he believed that conventional pest-control methods—whether chemical or mechanical—were futile if they ignored the relationships among insects. His fields, notably free of rice leaf-hoppers–tiny, sap-sucking enemies of rice crops–became a case study for scientists who wondered how his ecosystem seemed to regulate itself.
Chemical herbicides, however, remained godsent for many farmers. Before their invention, weeding rice fields was a grueling task, involving miles of walking through flooded paddies with a weeding tool. Fukuoka understood why these chemicals were embraced but urged farmers to consider the long-term costs—to the soil, the crops, and their own health.
The inspiration for Fukuoka’s approach to rice farming came early in his life–from an abandoned field he stumbled upon, where healthy rice seedlings were thriving in a tangle of weeds. This chance encounter led him to rethink the entire planting cycle. Instead of sowing seeds in spring, he turned into balls and began scattering them in the fall, mimicking the natural drama of the plant. By tilting the balance slightly in favour of his crops and interfering as little as possible, he found a way to produce a copious amount of yields without disrupting the ecosystem.
“Almost everyone thinks that ‘nature’ is a good thing, but few can grasp the difference between natural and unnatural,” he wrote. For Fukuoka, farming was a sacred act, grounded in a philosophy that goes beyond considerations of soil analysis and harvest yields. He saw food as a mirror of the human condition: crops grown unnaturally weakened the body, creating a cycle of dependence on supplements and medicines.
Also read: Bullocks are staring at an existential crisis
India, with its longer growing season and rich biodiversity, offered fertile ground for Fukuoka’s ideas. During his visit to the country, he met Subhash Palekar, a farmer from Maharashtra who had been practicing chemical farming until 1986. Inspired by Fukuoka, Palekar developed Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF), a system that has since gained traction across Karnataka and beyond. Of course, Indian farmers had been practicing various forms of natural farming for centuries before the green revolution, in the 1960s, forced them to adopt high-cost chemicals and hybrid seeds. But these methods yielded crops at the cost of the soil’s health and nourishment. So, when Fukuoka carried his technique to India in 1988, it was welcome.
The Indian government has recently taken significant steps to promote natural farming as part of its low-carbon agricultural transition. The 2024-25 Union Budget reduced fertiliser subsidies and earmarked resources for 10,000 bio-input resource centers. These hubs aim to distribute natural fertilisers like “Jeevamrit” and neem-based pesticides, supporting the government’s goal of bringing one crore farmers into natural farming by 2025. Yet, logistical challenges remain, from scaling up these initiatives to ensuring farmers have the resources and knowledge to make the transition.
(Banner image: https://landbyhand.org/natural-farming-with-masanobu-fukuoka/)
Also read: How an Alappuzha coir exporter nurtured a one-acre forest
A breakdown of the major differences between both practices
About 65% of India’s workforce is directly involved in agriculture, making it a vital part of the economy and essential for meeting the needs of 1.4 billion people. Farming in India plays a crucial role in providing livelihoods, ensuring food security, and contributing significantly to the country’s GDP. However, rising food demand, coupled with limited arable land and finite natural resources, has led to a heavy reliance on chemical fertilisers. This dependency has caused serious problems, including groundwater contamination, soil degradation, and the buildup of toxic metals in soil and food.
In this context, natural and organic farming offer important alternatives to conventional methods. Both practices focus on sustainability and aim to restore ecological balance. Understanding the differences between natural and organic farming is key for farmers, consumers, and policymakers, helping them adopt more sustainable agricultural practices that reduce environmental damage.
Natural farming is based on the principle of working entirely within nature’s limits. It avoids all external inputs, including organic fertilisers, aiming to replicate natural ecosystems. The focus is on enhancing local biodiversity and using natural processes to maintain soil fertility and control pests. For example, natural farming encourages the use of indigenous crops suited to local conditions, helping to sustain the ecosystem’s balance. Originating in Japan, this method integrates crops, livestock, and trees in a way that mirrors natural systems. Farmers who adopt natural farming rely on local knowledge and traditional practices passed down through generations.
Organic farming, on the other hand, follows a regulated system that allows certain approved organic inputs, such as compost and natural pest control methods. It prohibits synthetic chemicals and genetically modified organisms (GMOs), ensuring food is safe to eat and environmentally friendly. Organic farming focuses on improving soil health with techniques like crop rotation, cover cropping, and composting. These practices not only boost soil fertility but also encourage biodiversity by creating habitats for organisms vital to a healthy ecosystem.
Subhash Palekar Natural Farming, earlier known as Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF), is a standout model of sustainable agriculture in India. Created by Padma Shri awardee Subhash Palekar, this approach has transformed farming in over 700 villages across states like Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, and Himachal Pradesh under the Centre’s Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana initiative.
The core of this method lies in efficient use of resources. Farmers are encouraged to move away from costly external inputs like chemical fertilisers and pesticides. Instead, they rely on locally available materials such as cow dung, crop residues, and other organic matter to enrich the soil. The approach promotes intercropping and polyculture—growing multiple crops together instead of focusing on monoculture. This not only boosts productivity but also makes crops more resilient to pests and diseases.
Water management is another key element of this system. With water scarcity posing a major challenge for farmers, Palekar’s method highlights the importance of conserving water while maintaining adequate crop moisture. Techniques like mulching and rainwater harvesting help farmers reduce their dependence on irrigation and use water resources more sustainably.
Natural and organic farming use distinct methods to achieve sustainable agriculture.
Natural farming relies entirely on nature’s processes, avoiding any external inputs like fertilisers or pesticides. Farmers let nature guide their work, maintaining soil health through microorganisms that naturally break down organic matter. These microbes play a vital role in recycling nutrients and improving soil structure.
Pest control in natural farming involves attracting beneficial insects and predators instead of using chemicals. For example, ladybirds help control aphids without harming the environment or human health. Weed management is minimal, with many farmers avoiding ploughing or tilling to preserve soil structure and protect beneficial organisms in the soil.
Organic farming enhances soil fertility through organic inputs like compost from plant material or animal manure. These enrich the soil with nutrients, improve its structure, and boost water retention. Unlike natural farming’s hands-off approach, organic farming allows some intervention, following strict rules set by regulatory bodies.
In organic systems, pest control may include naturally derived pesticides or integrated pest management, combining biological methods with cultural practices to limit pest damage while avoiding synthetic chemicals. Regulated weeding practices help maintain crop health without damaging soil quality.
Natural and organic farming, despite their differences, share key principles that reflect their commitment to sustainable agriculture.
Both methods are entirely chemical-free, avoiding synthetic substances that could harm human health or damage the environment over time. This approach ensures safer food production for consumers.
They also prioritise biodiversity by promoting indigenous crops and livestock suited to local conditions. This supports local ecosystems and improves resilience to pests and diseases.
Sustainability is another common goal. Both systems focus on improving soil health and maintaining ecological balance, ensuring fertile land and diverse farming opportunities for future generations.
While natural and organic farming share goals of sustainability and ecological balance, their methods differ in key ways.
Natural farming follows a zero-intervention philosophy, letting nature take the lead with no external inputs or controls. Farmers rely entirely on natural processes to manage soil fertility, pests, and crops.
In contrast, organic farming allows limited intervention within strict guidelines. These regulations ensure consistency with organic standards, maintaining consumer trust while offering farmers a pathway to certification.
Cost is another key difference. Natural farming is generally more affordable as it relies on local resources and avoids the need for certified inputs or compliance with regulatory frameworks, which are required in organic farming.
Natural farming takes a hands-off approach, allowing ecosystems to flourish without human interference. Organic farming, however, uses controlled interventions and regulation to balance sustainability with agricultural productivity.
Both approaches play a vital role in advancing sustainable farming in India, a country grappling with food security challenges, rapid population growth, and environmental damage caused by chemical-intensive farming.
The future of sustainable agriculture, explained
Around 3.6 billion people live in regions highly vulnerable to climate change, underscoring the urgent need for proactive solutions. In developing nations with fragile health systems, the capacity to adapt is limited, making climate resilience even more critical.
Amid these challenges, organic farming offers a promising path forward. By reducing greenhouse gas emissions and encouraging sustainable choices in transportation, food production, and energy use, organic farming can help build resilience in vulnerable regions.
Organic farming plays a key role in combating climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Nitrous oxide (N2O), a powerful greenhouse gas, is directly linked to nitrogen fertilisers. Studies show that eliminating synthetic nitrogen fertilisers could cut global agricultural emissions by up to 20%.
This reduction stems from organic farming’s focus on creating closed nutrient cycles. Without synthetic fertilisers, organic farms minimise nitrogen losses through runoff, volatilisation, and emissions resulting in lower nitrogen levels compared to conventional farms, promoting a more sustainable, climate-friendly food production system with adequate yields.
A 40-year study by the Rodale Institute found that organic farms use 45% less energy than conventional ones while achieving comparable or even higher yields after a five-year transition. Organic farming also eliminates fumigant pesticides, which are common in conventional farming and contribute to N2O emissions, further highlighting organic farming’s environmental benefits.
Also read: Sikkim shows how to farm without chemicals
Soils are the Earth’s largest carbon reservoirs, sequestering more carbon than the atmosphere and all life combined. The EU’s “Soil: The hidden part of the climate cycle" report emphasises the potential for enhancing soil carbon storage through organic farming practices.
Soil invertebrates, essential for forming organic carbon, play a crucial role in carbon sequestration. A review of nearly 400 studies showed that pesticide use harms these invertebrates in over 70% of cases. By switching to organic farming, farmers can reduce pesticide impacts, promote soil health, and increase carbon sequestration.
Organic farming helps farmers adapt to climate change by maintaining soil health. Practices like minimum tillage, crop residue incorporation, cover crops, crop rotations, and nitrogen-fixing legumes boost soil organic matter, increase carbon storage, and reduce nutrient and water loss.
Organic farming offers significant environmental benefits by cutting out energy-intensive inputs and relying less on external resources, leading to lower energy consumption and minimized fuel use.
Eliminating energy-intensive inputs: Organic farming bans fossil fuel-based fertilizers and most synthetic pesticides. These chemicals require substantial energy to produce, so removing them reduces the overall carbon footprint. Organic farms focus on internal nutrient cycling and fewer outside inputs.
Lower energy consumption: Without synthetic fertilisers, organic farming reduces the energy needed for their production and transportation. Research shows a 30-70% decrease in energy use per unit of land compared to conventional farming.
Minimized fuel use: Organic farms often use on-farm resources like compost and manure, cutting down on transportation and further lowering carbon emissions.
Organic farming not only benefits the environment but also helps farmers adapt to the effects of climate change.
Building resilient soil: Organic farms prioritise healthy soil through practices like crop rotation, composting, and using natural inputs.
Better water retention: Organic soil holds water more efficiently, which is essential during droughts. Studies in the USA and Germany confirm that organic soil has superior water retention.
Improved flood resilience: Well-structured soil with good drainage can absorb more water, reducing flood damage and soil erosion.
Resistance to degradation: Organic matter improves soil structure, making it more resilient to extreme weather events.
Organic farmers often focus on diverse seed and crop varieties, which leads to:
Enhanced pest and disease resistance: A mix of crops creates a less predictable environment for pests and diseases, reducing the likelihood of widespread outbreaks.
Greater adaptability: A variety of crops allows farmers to adjust their planting strategies in response to changing climate conditions.
Also read: How ancient recipes are reclaiming India’s plate
The combination of healthy soil, diverse crops, and stable ecosystems results in:
Reduced risk: Organic farms face fewer risks from extreme weather events and pest outbreaks, leading to more consistent yields.
Lower production costs: Fewer external inputs like synthetic fertilisers and pesticides reduce overall production costs for farmers.
Organic farming provides farmers with the tools to build resilient, adaptable agricultural systems that thrive in changing climates. The approach benefits the environment, enhances food security, and supports the long-term sustainability of farming practices.
What you eat can save entire ecosystems
Organic food isn’t just a trend; it’s a healthier, more sustainable way of living. For decades, researchers have highlighted the benefits of organic farming for both human health and the planet.
Unlike conventional farming, which relies heavily on synthetic fertilisers and pesticides, organic practices work in harmony with nature. By choosing organic, you’re making an investment in your well-being and a better future for the environment.
Here’s a deeper look into why organic food is a smart choice for both your plate and the planet.
Chemical exposure: Organic foods are free from harmful pesticides, contaminants, and synthetic additives found in conventional options, helping you avoid unnecessary chemical intake. Studies show that organic foods have significantly lower pesticide residues compared to conventional produce, which is crucial for reducing exposure to toxic chemicals.
More nutritious: A 2016 European study found that organic meat and milk contain up to 50% more omega-3 fatty acids than conventional options. Additionally, organic produce is often richer in essential vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants. For instance, organically grown berries and corn have been shown to contain up to 58% more antioxidants and higher levels of vitamin C.
Lower health risks: Research suggests that consuming organic foods may help lower the risk of certain health issues, particularly among women. A systematic review indicated that regular consumption of organic products is associated with reduced risks of obesity and certain cancers.
Antioxidants-rich: Organic foods are higher in antioxidants, which protect your cells from damage and may lower the risk of chronic diseases. Studies indicate that antioxidant levels can be up to 69% higher in organic foods compared to conventional ones.
Cleaner, simpler nutrition: Free from artificial colors, flavors, and preservatives, organic foods offer a purer way to nourish your body. This simplicity promotes a healthier lifestyle without the burden of synthetic additives.
No GMO: Organic produce is GMO-free, ensuring you enjoy the freshest and most natural food possible. This aspect aligns with consumer preferences for non-genetically modified options.
Fighting climate change: Organic farming practices like composting and crop rotation help store carbon in the soil, reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Research indicates that organic farms can sequester more carbon compared to conventional farms.
Natural methods: Organic farmers utilise crop rotation, composting, and natural pest control instead of synthetic chemicals. This approach fosters a healthier environment by promoting biodiversity and soil health.
Reduce pollution: By avoiding synthetic fertilisers and pesticides, organic farming minimises harmful chemical runoff into air, soil, and waterways. This protection is vital for maintaining healthy ecosystems.
Eco-friendly packaging: Many organic products come in sustainable packaging options like glass jars or reusable containers, further reducing waste and minimising environmental footprints.
Also read: Against the grain: Lab couple goes organic
Protecting aquatic ecosystems: By avoiding synthetic fertilisers, organic farming prevents toxic runoff that pollutes rivers and lakes. This practice helps maintain cleaner water sources essential for aquatic life.
Healthy pollinators: Organic farming methods create safe havens for pollinators such as bees and butterflies. These insects are crucial for food production; their protection is threatened by conventional farming's heavy pesticide use.
Safeguarding wildlife habitats: By steering clear of toxic herbicides and insecticides, organic farming protects wildlife habitats from chemical accumulation that disrupts natural ecosystems.
Organic farmers often rely on traditional seed varieties known for their resilience to disease and climate stress. This practice enhances genetic diversity within crops, reducing the risk of widespread failures due to disease or environmental changes. In contrast, conventional farming typically depends on a narrow range of seed varieties.
Also read: The tribal seed guardians of Dindori
Going organic isn’t just about what’s on your plate; it’s an investment in a healthier future for yourself and the environment. By choosing cleaner, nutrient-rich food and supporting sustainable practices, every organic choice creates a positive ripple effect–protecting ecosystems while promoting long-term sustainability.
Please try another keyword to match the results