Teasing grain, vegetables, and citrus from the earth has always demanded back-breaking labour. The life of a farmer is one of constant exposure—to the merciless summer sun, the bitter chill of winter, and the unpredictable rains. And the toil doesn’t stop with the weather. Pest invasions, crop failures, and slim margins often drive farmers to abandon their fields, for the promise of steadier incomes in urban areas. The modern agricultural system, which relies heavily on machines plowing through fields and industrial grade pouring of chemicals over crops, has left many farmers feeling overwhelmed and disillusioned.
Amid a system that constantly demanded more labour and machinery, came Masanobu Fukuoka: a Japanese farmer and philosopher with an entirely different approach—one rooted in humility and a near-religious deference to nature. Fukuoka passed away in 2008 at the age of 95, but his philosophy continues to resonate. His vision—of a farming system that works with nature rather than against it—offers a counterpoint to the high-input, high-stress agriculture that dominates much of the world today.
His method, often referred to as “do-nothing” farming, rejects the core pillars of conventional agriculture: no plowing, no chemical fertilisers, no pesticides, and no weeding. Fukuoka doesn’t mean to say that farmers should sit idle. Rather, his philosophy is about stepping back and observing nature’s wisdom, allowing it to guide farming practices instead of imposing human will.
Born in 1913, Fukuoka’s journey to this radical simplicity was anything but straightforward. He began his career as a scientist, working in a laboratory to develop agricultural techniques. But a crisis of faith in the modern approach to farming led him to return to his native village. There, he tested his ideas on his own fields, slowly uncovering what he called “natural farming.”
Beyond conventional wisdom
“An object seen in isolation from the whole is not the real thing,” Fukuoka wrote in his 1975 book The One-Straw Revolution, a no-tilling manifesto. Through this work, he gently but firmly dismantled the premises of modern agriculture, arguing that they had damaged the soil, weakened plants, and poisoned ecosystems. For Fukuoka, nature was a unified and self-sufficient whole, capable of thriving without human interference. Human “cleverness,” he believed, was often the root of the problem.
Natural farming, as Fukuoka practiced it, required less labour than traditional methods but not a complete absence of effort. Although the method is also called ‘no-till’ or ’do-nothing farming’, it doesn’t translate to sitting back and relaxing. There was still work to be done—casting seeds, mulching, and maintaining the land thoughtfully with care and sensitivity. But the goal was to work in a symbiosis with nature, not in disruption of it. For example, instead of plowing to control weeds, Fukuoka used a ground cover of white clover and a mulch of barley straw to suppress unwanted growth. His approach was deliberate and experimental, not one that left the land recklessly abandoned.
Also read: Sikkim shows how to farm without chemicals
“Crops grow themselves,” he famously proclaims, insisting that plants, left to their natural course, would flourish without the need for heavy-handed human intervention. Yet, he acknowledged that this philosophy cannot be adopted overnight. Transitioning to natural farming often requires an initial period of adjustment—some weeding, composting, or pruning—but these measures would gradually diminish as the system stabilises.
Rethinking weeds and insects
Fukuoka distilled his philosophy into four guiding principles: no cultivation, no chemical fertilisers or prepared compost, no weeding by tillage or herbicides, and no dependence on chemicals. These were not rigid commandments but a framework that farmers can adapt to their unique environments. Fukuoka repeatedly emphasised that his methods were not recipes to be copied. When one of his students tried to replicate his techniques on a different land, the attempt failed. Each plot of land, Fukuoka argued, requires its own process of observation and experimentation.
The man’s admiration for nature extended to weeds and insects, long considered villains of the farm. Weeds, he argued, often played a beneficial role: fixing nitrogen in the soil, aerating it, and even repelling harmful pests. Similarly, he believed that conventional pest-control methods—whether chemical or mechanical—were futile if they ignored the relationships among insects. His fields, notably free of rice leaf-hoppers–tiny, sap-sucking enemies of rice crops–became a case study for scientists who wondered how his ecosystem seemed to regulate itself.
Chemical herbicides, however, remained godsent for many farmers. Before their invention, weeding rice fields was a grueling task, involving miles of walking through flooded paddies with a weeding tool. Fukuoka understood why these chemicals were embraced but urged farmers to consider the long-term costs—to the soil, the crops, and their own health.
A straw revolution
The inspiration for Fukuoka’s approach to rice farming came early in his life–from an abandoned field he stumbled upon, where healthy rice seedlings were thriving in a tangle of weeds. This chance encounter led him to rethink the entire planting cycle. Instead of sowing seeds in spring, he turned into balls and began scattering them in the fall, mimicking the natural drama of the plant. By tilting the balance slightly in favour of his crops and interfering as little as possible, he found a way to produce a copious amount of yields without disrupting the ecosystem.
“Almost everyone thinks that ‘nature’ is a good thing, but few can grasp the difference between natural and unnatural,” he wrote. For Fukuoka, farming was a sacred act, grounded in a philosophy that goes beyond considerations of soil analysis and harvest yields. He saw food as a mirror of the human condition: crops grown unnaturally weakened the body, creating a cycle of dependence on supplements and medicines.
Also read: Bullocks are staring at an existential crisis
Natural farming in India
India, with its longer growing season and rich biodiversity, offered fertile ground for Fukuoka’s ideas. During his visit to the country, he met Subhash Palekar, a farmer from Maharashtra who had been practicing chemical farming until 1986. Inspired by Fukuoka, Palekar developed Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF), a system that has since gained traction across Karnataka and beyond. Of course, Indian farmers had been practicing various forms of natural farming for centuries before the green revolution, in the 1960s, forced them to adopt high-cost chemicals and hybrid seeds. But these methods yielded crops at the cost of the soil’s health and nourishment. So, when Fukuoka carried his technique to India in 1988, it was welcome.
The Indian government has recently taken significant steps to promote natural farming as part of its low-carbon agricultural transition. The 2024-25 Union Budget reduced fertiliser subsidies and earmarked resources for 10,000 bio-input resource centers. These hubs aim to distribute natural fertilisers like “Jeevamrit” and neem-based pesticides, supporting the government’s goal of bringing one crore farmers into natural farming by 2025. Yet, logistical challenges remain, from scaling up these initiatives to ensuring farmers have the resources and knowledge to make the transition.
(Banner image: https://landbyhand.org/natural-farming-with-masanobu-fukuoka/)
Also read: How an Alappuzha coir exporter nurtured a one-acre forest